When thinking about market size, it's common for people to say "Remote Patient Monitoring" or "RPM" but mean very different things. Does it mean money spent:
To complicate things even more complicated, remote patient monitoring is increasingly being included as one aspect of a bundled virtual care or remote care offering. For example, if an online Telehealth company like Ro includes a connected weight scale as part of their GLP1 program, is that remote patient monitoring? We will attempt to be clear on this in our estimates below.
There are several ways in which the RPM market is commonly segmented:
In this analysis, we will focus on segmentation by customer type, because that's what typically separates sales channels and companies. The most common customer types being served in the remote patient monitoring industry are:
Here are some of the top Remote Patient Monitoring companies by market segment. Note: if there is a company that you believe should be added to this list please contact us and let us know!
Disclaimer: This is an estimate. Use at your own risk.
The Remote Patient Monitoring services market has been growing somewhere between a 20% to 50% CAGR. This has been driven to a large degree by rapid expansion of RPM in the Physician Practices and Health Systems segment, which came with reimbursements that took effect in 2019 and effectively doubled the market size for multiple consecutive years. COVID also provided a tailwind.
However, the estimated market size for Private Payers and Employers is still larger, with companies like Omada Health and Livongo (Teledoc) booking hundreds of millions of dollars per year in revenue.
It should be noted that in many cases the connected device data is only a component of a larger set of care management services. The revenue to the connected device companies is therefore a fraction of this total.
Today, the fitness devices market is likely many times larger than the market for medical remote patient monitoring devices. Apple Watch, which is more than a fitness device, the the clear market leader, with Fitbit and Garmin coming in at a distant second and third position. Many of these devices are not cleared by the FDA and are not typically used for more serious medical applications.
There are many interesting conclusions that could be gained from this data. However, one possible conclusion is that in top-performing products, it's difficult to separate the value of the medical data being generated from other functionalities. While health monitoring is a feature, the Apple Watch offers far more than just health monitoring (text messages, apps, other convenience, etc.). While health monitoring will often still be the product (especially in medical cases), in other cases it may be a feature that also includes aspects of status, convenience, social connection, entertainment or other innate benefits to their human end-users.
The estimates below are compiled based on the following data sources and assumptions:
Want access to the spreadsheet or the list of sources? Just contact us and ask ;-)